Tuesday, January 07, 2014

Unpublished Decision

U.S. v. Bergman, 2013 WL 6728103 (12/23/13) (Col.) (unpub'd) - The district court was wrong to say it had no jurisdiction to consider the defendant's motion seeking the return of surrendered funds while the government appealed the district court's refusal to hold a new trial to the 10th. The appeal and the motion involved two different matters. But the defendant's motion was meritless because she had already settled the forfeiture matter.