Tenth Circuit Blog
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Woodward v. Cline, 2012 WL 3871594 (9/7/12) (Kan.) (Published) - The petitioner's post-conviction motion for DNA testing was a motion for discovery, not a motion for "collateral relief" that would toll the running of AEDPA's statute of limitation.
posted by Anonymous at
2:46 PM
<< Home
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Tenth Circuit
Previous Posts
Unpublished Decisions
OK Prosecutors' Flouting of Law Prohibiting Improp...
Abundant Evidence of Discriminatory Practice at Po...
Divided Panel Affirms Conviction for "Organizing o...
2255 Petition Was Untimely
Collateral Consequences Resource
RICO, Drug Convictions Affirmed
Unpublished Decisions
Following Remand, Tenth Reaffirms Carjacking and R...
Relief Granted; 2255 Petitioner Gets Hearing on Cr...
<< Home