Prior OK Conviction Qualifies As A Drug Offense Under Guidelines
U.S. v. Smith, --- F.3d ----, 2006 WL 14571(10th Cir. January 04, 2006)
10th upheld district court decision that under the advisory guidelines (and here the 10th demonstrates that if it is a GL sentence, and the appeal is taken totally within GL issues, the GLs get crunched like in the days of old, and the decisional law applies) D had a prior drug related conviction. The more broadly worded GL advisory notes indicate that D’s Oklahoma prior for “acquiring proceeds derived from illegal drug activity” is a drug prior, even though the guideline itself is narrower and does not list anything like “acquiring proceeds” as qualifying. The GL notes say “aiding and abetting”= drug offense, and the Okla. stat. prohibits conduct that looks like aiding and abetting, so 10th looks at the Okla. charging documents and proceedings and D said in Okla. plea that he received the money from selling drugs. So, his prior should be treated as drug related under the GL.
10th upheld district court decision that under the advisory guidelines (and here the 10th demonstrates that if it is a GL sentence, and the appeal is taken totally within GL issues, the GLs get crunched like in the days of old, and the decisional law applies) D had a prior drug related conviction. The more broadly worded GL advisory notes indicate that D’s Oklahoma prior for “acquiring proceeds derived from illegal drug activity” is a drug prior, even though the guideline itself is narrower and does not list anything like “acquiring proceeds” as qualifying. The GL notes say “aiding and abetting”= drug offense, and the Okla. stat. prohibits conduct that looks like aiding and abetting, so 10th looks at the Okla. charging documents and proceedings and D said in Okla. plea that he received the money from selling drugs. So, his prior should be treated as drug related under the GL.
<< Home